<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Parallax View: Social Business &#38; Enterprise 2.0 &#187; Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theparallaxview.com/tag/facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theparallaxview.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Inside the Firewall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:16:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Why Forbes says e-mail is so last century</title>
		<link>http://theparallaxview.com/2009/01/forbes-email-century/</link>
		<comments>http://theparallaxview.com/2009/01/forbes-email-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>russell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FriendFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Comms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Schaffner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theparallaxview.com/?p=1130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com/2009/01/forbes-email-century/">Why Forbes says e-mail is so last century</a></p><p>Web 2.0 has arrived and your company needs it, now. Who says so? Forbes&#8217; Mike Schaffner does &#8216;Why Companies Need Web 2.0&#8242;. For Schaffner we&#8217;re in a web 2.0 world now that extends from his daughter&#8217;s vacation in Paris through to the next wave of new employees.  Schaffner lists out the whole sweet shop &#8211; RSS, [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com">The Parallax View: Social Business &amp; Enterprise 2.0 - Social Media Inside the Firewall</a> </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com/2009/01/forbes-email-century/">Why Forbes says e-mail is so last century</a></p><p>Web 2.0 has arrived and your company needs it, now. Who says so? Forbes&#8217; Mike Schaffner does &#8216;Why Companies Need Web 2.0&#8242;. For Schaffner we&#8217;re in a web 2.0 world now that extends from his daughter&#8217;s vacation in Paris through to the next wave of new employees. </p>
<p>Schaffner lists out the whole sweet shop &#8211; RSS, Wiki, Blog, YouTube, FriendFeed, MySpace, Facebook and Twitter. E-mail he says is so last decade, it&#8217;s an old hat. Thus use Twitter instread says Schaffner, who can can see collaborative communications research done in a tweet:</p>
<blockquote><p>Imagine someone putting out a Twitter message (a &#8220;tweet&#8221;) that says, &#8220;I&#8217;m updating the marketing plan, does anyone have any info on X?&#8221; rather than sending out an e-mail that gets lost in everyone&#8217;s inbox. The tweet may have a wider reach and generate a better response. </p></blockquote>
<p>And it&#8217;s not just convenience or the need to attract the best talent that&#8217;s at stake. It&#8217;s time to move forward or perish:</p>
<blockquote><p>Like it or not, our employees and customers&#8211;not to mention our competitors&#8211;are using these technologies now and will soon be expecting you to provide them, too. Don&#8217;t do it and you may find yourself at a competitive disadvantage. What are you doing about using these technologies inside your company?</p></blockquote>
<p>The eagle 2.0, has landed, well ok it&#8217;s still landing (07.07.08). But as soon as this is posted I&#8217;ll communicate it via Twitter and FriendFeed&#8230;as one does.</p>
<p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com">The Parallax View: Social Business &amp; Enterprise 2.0 - Social Media Inside the Firewall</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparallaxview.com/2009/01/forbes-email-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySpaceID: Google 1, Microsoft 0</title>
		<link>http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/myspaceid-google-1-microsoft-0/</link>
		<comments>http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/myspaceid-google-1-microsoft-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>russell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlene Li]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpaceID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netvibes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readwriteweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russellpearson.co.uk/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/myspaceid-google-1-microsoft-0/">MySpaceID: Google 1, Microsoft 0</a></p><p>A great post from Rick Turoczy on readwriteweb on the ongoing format login scrap between Facebook and MySpace. Rick comes down firmly in favour of MySpace arguing that their way is more Open and favours interoperability. What&#8217;s more he says, MySpaceID: fires a very real shot across Facebook&#8217;s bow. And continues to set the stage for the [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com">The Parallax View: Social Business &amp; Enterprise 2.0 - Social Media Inside the Firewall</a> </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/myspaceid-google-1-microsoft-0/">MySpaceID: Google 1, Microsoft 0</a></p><p>A great post from <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/about_RickTuroczy.php">Rick Turoczy</a> on readwriteweb on the ongoing <del datetime="00">format</del> login scrap between Facebook and MySpace. Rick comes down firmly in favour of MySpace arguing that their way is more Open and favours interoperability. What&#8217;s more he says, MySpaceID:</p>
<blockquote><p>fires a very real shot across Facebook&#8217;s bow. And continues to set the stage for the tag-team match between the more proprietary Facebook-Microsoft and the more open MySpace-Google. (<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspaceid_myspace_sides_with_t.php">source</a>)<br />
 </p></blockquote>
<p>Over at cnet, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10118553-2.html">Caroline McCarthy explains</a> that MySpace are building on the open standards of &#8216;OpenSocial&#8217; and &#8216;OpenID&#8217; and says that MySpace are partnering with the giant European SP Vodafone and souped-up bespoke RSS factory <a href="http://www.netvibes.com/">Netvibes</a>. I use both of these and like the service and reckon that this alliance might well be interesting.</p>
<p>Why so? Well Rick likens the MySpaceID move to the days of 1.0 when more adventurous ISPs opened the cracks in the walled gardens of AoL and Compuserve. This he says, led to the more open web we enjoy today. Thus the development from MySpace-Google also opens the way for a more open (and user-friendly) 2.0 web, which has to be a positive development. Add that to Vodafone&#8217;s reach and Netvibes&#8217; personalised functional-funkiness and we&#8217;re also looking at some nicely synched up apps in future.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong></p>
<p>An intriguing quote from <a href="http://blog.altimetergroup.com/" class="broken_link">Charlene Li</a> on the <a href="http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2008/12/solving-the-webs-multiple-personality-disorder/">FT Tech Blog</a> on this topic:</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s not about one standard winning over the other, it’s not about Betamax versus VHS&#8230;At some point everything will connect, because the user will absolutely demand it.</p></blockquote>
<p>We all will, but if one is closed and proprietary, hasn&#8217;t the battle been lost by then? As an alternative <a href="http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/author/richardwaters/">Richard Waters</a> wonders if the primary sign-in app (i.e the winner) will define who/what we are online. And if Facebook is the winner, are we looking at 3.0 being a closed garden? I hope not&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com">The Parallax View: Social Business &amp; Enterprise 2.0 - Social Media Inside the Firewall</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/myspaceid-google-1-microsoft-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Republican Army Surrenders</title>
		<link>http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/facebook-republican-army-not/</link>
		<comments>http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/facebook-republican-army-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>russell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Republican Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve O\'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russellpearson.co.uk/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/facebook-republican-army-not/">Facebook Republican Army Surrenders</a></p><p>After a concerted tabloid frenzy the supposed leader of the Facebook Republican Army Steve O&#8217;Brien has told The Times it&#8217;s a big hoax after all. Well only after Sky News (who also happen to own The Times), had syndicated it to FoxNews. Who it turns out are in turn owned by the company that owns [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com">The Parallax View: Social Business &amp; Enterprise 2.0 - Social Media Inside the Firewall</a> </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/facebook-republican-army-not/">Facebook Republican Army Surrenders</a></p><p>After a concerted tabloid frenzy the supposed leader of the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=facebook+republican+army&amp;start=10&amp;sa=N">Facebook Republican Army</a> Steve O&#8217;Brien has told The Times it&#8217;s a <a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5295062.ece">big hoax</a> after all.</p>
<p>Well only after Sky News (who also happen to <a href="http://www.newsinternational.co.uk/">own</a> The Times), had syndicated it to <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,461026,00.html">FoxNews</a>. Who it turns out are in turn owned by the company that owns them all too, the <a href="http://www.newscorp.com/">News Corporation</a>. All too confusing for a bear of this little brains, but it might explain why they weren&#8217;t the MySpace Republican Army, as of course the NewsCorp <a href="http://www.newscorp.com/operations/other.html#">owns them too</a>.</p>
<p>Makes one wonder though, why the journos didn&#8217;t just go onto Facebook and ask a few questions. But I suspect lurid tales of ne&#8217;re do wells up to mischief on the family washing machine pays the bills&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://theparallaxview.com">The Parallax View: Social Business &amp; Enterprise 2.0 - Social Media Inside the Firewall</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparallaxview.com/2008/12/facebook-republican-army-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/23 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1279/1323 objects using disk: basic

Served from: theparallaxview.com @ 2012-02-10 15:00:21 -->
